PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMX.L vs. ROLL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COMX.L is traded in GBp, while ROLL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ROLL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMX.L achieves a 19.80% return, which is significantly lower than ROLL.L's 22.67% return.


COMX.L

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.23%
6M
15.00%
YTD
19.80%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
10Y*

ROLL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
6M
15.72%
YTD
22.67%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COMX.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF
19.80%8.58%6.24%-12.51%28.76%-25.70%
ROLL.L
iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.67%8.61%6.51%-7.11%30.54%-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between COMX.L and ROLL.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2021

0.83

The correlation between COMX.L and ROLL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMX.L
COMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
COMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
COMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ROLL.L
ROLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ROLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COMX.LROLL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.73

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

8.93

-2.03

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the ROLL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMX.L and ROLL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMX.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than ROLL.L's maximum drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMX.L and ROLL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMX.LROLL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-23.20%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-12.10%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-13.37%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-8.08%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.66%

-9.49%

-7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

3.70%

+0.59%

Volatility

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMX.LROLL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.16%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.15%

15.01%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

17.18%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

16.41%

+3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.38%

15.42%

+4.96%

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMX.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ROLL.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMX.L vs. ROLL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMX.L nor ROLL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, COMX.L and ROLL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, COMX.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMX.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ROLL.L.

COMX.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while ROLL.L tracks iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMX.L and 0.28% for ROLL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMX.L and ROLL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer