PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMX.L vs. ETRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMX.L achieves a 26.39% return, which is significantly higher than ETRA.L's 15.00% return.


COMX.L

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
26.39%
6M
24.79%
1Y
40.20%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
10Y*

ETRA.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.37%
YTD
15.00%
6M
22.60%
1Y
42.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COMX.L
WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF
26.39%8.58%-1.28%
ETRA.L
L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc
15.00%19.38%-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between COMX.L and ETRA.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024

0.60

The correlation between COMX.L and ETRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMX.L
COMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
COMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
COMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ETRA.L
ETRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ETRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ETRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMX.LETRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.58

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

4.81

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

16.90

-13.84

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the ETRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMX.L and ETRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMX.LETRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

3.07

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.15

-1.01

Drawdowns

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMX.L drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than ETRA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMX.L and ETRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMX.LETRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-15.11%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.58%

-8.70%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-2.15%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.64%

-6.30%

-11.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.10%

2.48%

+10.62%

Volatility

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Broad Commodities UCITS ETF (COMX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETRA.L) at 3.10%. This indicates that COMX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMX.LETRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

3.10%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

11.44%

+4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.18%

13.65%

+31.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.36%

12.90%

+19.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.36%

12.90%

+19.46%

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMX.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETRA.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMX.L vs. ETRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMX.L nor ETRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COMX.L and ETRA.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMX.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMX.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ETRA.L.

COMX.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while ETRA.L tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMX.L and 0.65% for ETRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMX.L and ETRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer