COMT vs. LVHI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. COMT is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COMT returned 12.68%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COMT charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.

Performance

COMT vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 35.49% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 11.45% return.

COMT

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: 35.49%
• 6M: 35.13%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: 12.68%
• 10Y*: 8.65%

LVHI

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 29.27%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMT vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	35.49%	6.07%	5.96%	-6.56%	19.45%	36.88%	-18.66%	10.81%	-6.67%	11.70%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	11.45%	27.12%	14.81%	17.45%	3.84%	18.19%	-8.76%	18.35%	-5.22%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between COMT and LVHI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016	0.22

The correlation between COMT and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COMT vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COMT	LVHI
Financial Services	100.0%	23.6%
Basic Materials	-	6.1%
Communication Services	-	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	17.4%
Healthcare	-	7.4%
Industrials	-	13.4%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	10.4%

Return for Risk

COMT vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 69
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

LVHI

LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 92
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMT vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COMT	LVHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.10	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	4.24	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.58	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.99	4.84	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	19.99	-8.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COMT vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMT and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COMT	LVHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	3.10	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	1.42	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.81	-0.62

Drawdowns

COMT vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and LVHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	COMT	LVHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.89%	-32.31%	-19.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.27%	-6.08%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.31%	-11.99%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.00%	-11.99%	-17.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.67%	-1.79%	-5.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.05%	-3.52%	-20.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	1.47%	+2.00%

Volatility

COMT vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that COMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COMT	LVHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	2.35%	+4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.03%	7.58%	+11.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.50%	9.50%	+12.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.09%	11.07%	+10.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	13.76%	+5.14%

COMT vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

COMT vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than LVHI's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.71%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	4.79%	4.92%	3.98%	8.12%	7.74%	4.13%	3.97%	6.67%	10.67%	3.38%	2.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COMT and LVHI in my portfolio?

COMT and LVHI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COMT or LVHI?

COMT has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

Which ETF is better, COMT or LVHI?

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 12.68% for COMT. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COMT or LVHI?

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COMT or LVHI?

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COMT or LVHI?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 4.79% for LVHI.

What is the main difference between COMT and LVHI?

COMT is categorized as Commodities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for COMT and 0.40% for LVHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.