PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMT vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMT vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 30.63% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, COMT has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 8.40%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


COMT

1D
-1.20%
1M
-9.35%
YTD
30.63%
6M
31.55%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
8.40%

IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMT vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
30.63%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-6.67%11.70%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between COMT and IDMO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014

0.24

The correlation between COMT and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COMT vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COMT
IDMO

Financial Services

100.0%
42.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

1.9%

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Industrials

-

22.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

5.3%

Utilities

-

8.4%

Financial Services

COMT
100.0%
IDMO
42.4%

Basic Materials

COMT

-

IDMO
10.2%

Communication Services

COMT

-

IDMO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

COMT

-

IDMO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

COMT

-

IDMO
2.5%

Energy

COMT

-

IDMO
1.9%

Healthcare

COMT

-

IDMO
1.2%

Industrials

COMT

-

IDMO
22.6%

Real Estate

COMT

-

IDMO
2.0%

Technology

COMT

-

IDMO
5.3%

Utilities

COMT

-

IDMO
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMT vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMT vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COMTIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.89

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

7.64

+1.49

COMT vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMT and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COMT vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMTIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.89%

-39.38%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-12.31%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-12.65%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

-27.07%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-31.34%

-7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-1.92%

-9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.02%

-9.74%

-14.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.04%

+0.64%

Volatility

COMT vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) is 5.85%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that COMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMTIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

7.92%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.18%

16.02%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

17.92%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

18.03%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

18.18%

+0.72%

COMT vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMT vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than IDMO's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.93%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


COMT and IDMO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to COMT (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 8.40% for COMT. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 3.52% for IDMO.

COMT is categorized as Commodities, while IDMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for COMT and 0.25% for IDMO.

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMT and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer