PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMT vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMT vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 35.49% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 17.86% return. Over the past 10 years, COMT has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 8.65%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.23% annualized return.


COMT

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
35.49%
6M
35.13%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
8.65%

DXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.86%
6M
21.01%
1Y
51.36%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
25.93%
10Y*
18.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMT vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
35.49%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-6.67%11.70%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
17.86%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between COMT and DXJ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2014

0.23

The correlation between COMT and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COMT vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COMT
DXJ

Financial Services

100.0%
18.3%

Basic Materials

-

8.5%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

1.7%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

27.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.9%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Financial Services

COMT
100.0%
DXJ
18.3%

Basic Materials

COMT

-

DXJ
8.5%

Communication Services

COMT

-

DXJ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

COMT

-

DXJ
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

COMT

-

DXJ
4.7%

Energy

COMT

-

DXJ
1.7%

Healthcare

COMT

-

DXJ
6.8%

Industrials

COMT

-

DXJ
27.4%

Real Estate

COMT

-

DXJ

-

Technology

COMT

-

DXJ
12.9%

Utilities

COMT

-

DXJ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMT vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMT vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMTDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.53

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

4.70

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

18.34

-6.49

COMT vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMT and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMTDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.94

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.37

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.91

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.42

-0.23

Drawdowns

COMT vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, roughly equal to the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMTDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.89%

-49.63%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.27%

-10.98%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-22.19%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

-22.19%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-39.14%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-2.06%

-5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.05%

-14.33%

-9.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.81%

+0.66%

Volatility

COMT vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.19%. This indicates that COMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMTDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

4.19%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.03%

13.33%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

17.58%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

19.00%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

20.19%

-1.29%

COMT vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COMT and DXJ have an expense ratio of 0.48%.


Dividends

COMT vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than DXJ's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.71%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.10%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


COMT and DXJ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to DXJ (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.23% vs 8.65% for COMT. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.23% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT and DXJ have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 1.10% for DXJ.

COMT is categorized as Commodities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMT and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer