COMF.L vs. UC15.L
COMF.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - COMF.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return while UC15.L tracks the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COMF.L returned 8.22%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for UC15.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COMF.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COMF.L is traded in USD, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMF.L achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.34% return. Over the past 10 years, COMF.L has underperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 8.22%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.
COMF.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- YTD
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
UC15.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- YTD
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMF.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 15.66% | 16.43% | 5.13% | -6.37% | 18.73% | 32.96% | 2.52% | 7.36% | -8.43% | 3.10% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.34% | 10.01% | 4.66% | -1.58% | 16.07% | 34.87% | 0.50% | 9.54% | -11.09% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMF.L and UC15.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2010 | 0.80 |
The correlation between COMF.L and UC15.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMF.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
COMF.L
UC15.L
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COMF.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.69 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 9.30 | -2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMF.L drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMF.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMF.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.21% | -98.90% | +38.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -10.27% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.25% | -22.29% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.56% | -22.29% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.69% | -35.40% | +5.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -4.13% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.36% | -22.14% | -7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.98% | +0.79% |
Volatility
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) have volatilities of 3.91% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMF.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.00% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 11.40% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 13.23% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 19.82% | -4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 17.19% | -3.91% |
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMF.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMF.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COMF.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COMF.L and UC15.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMF.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMF.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: L&G and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for COMF.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for COMF.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer