COM vs. GSG
COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both Commodities funds - COM tracks the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index while GSG tracks the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COM returned 8.28%/yr vs 15.74%/yr for GSG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
COM vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.
COM
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
COM vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 14.96% | 7.72% | 5.81% | -2.09% | 9.17% | 28.00% | 6.63% | -0.18% | -0.03% | -2.05% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 42.58% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 10.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between COM and GSG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | 0.59 |
The correlation between COM and GSG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COM vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
COM
GSG
COM vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COM | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 5.47 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.37 | 14.39 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COM | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.26 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.70 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | -0.09 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
COM vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COM | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -89.62% | +73.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -9.46% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.50% | -14.94% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.02% | -29.12% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -56.95% | +52.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -63.71% | +57.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 3.59% | -2.03% |
Volatility
COM vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is 4.04%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that COM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COM | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 7.65% | -3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 20.42% | -11.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 22.95% | -12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 22.61% | -13.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.77% | 22.03% | -12.26% |
COM vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
COM vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.46% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COM and GSG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to COM (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COM dropped -15.95% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 15.74% vs 8.28% for COM. On fees, COM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, COM has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 15.74% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
COM has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
COM tracks Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for COM and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COM and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer