PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COM vs. CTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COM vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COM vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
14.18%7.72%5.81%-2.09%-11.04%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
12.39%0.88%24.15%-2.23%9.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COM achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly higher than CTA's 12.39% return.


COM

1D
0.21%
1M
5.67%
YTD
14.18%
6M
18.01%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

CTA

1D
-1.31%
1M
0.45%
YTD
12.39%
6M
10.76%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COM vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

COM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COM vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
CTA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COM vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMCTADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

0.40

+1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

0.63

+1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

0.66

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.37

1.14

+5.23

COM vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COM and CTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMCTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

0.40

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.69

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between COM and CTA is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

COM vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than CTA's 3.81% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.48%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
3.81%3.19%4.80%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COM vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COM drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COM and CTA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COMCTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-18.07%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-10.68%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.47%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-5.74%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

6.16%

-3.30%

Volatility

COM vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) is 3.77%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that COM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COMCTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

8.10%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

12.72%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

16.05%

-5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

15.58%

-5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.76%

15.58%

-5.82%