PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLO vs. OTGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COLO vs. OTGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COLO vs. OTGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
12.04%28.36%
OTGL
OTG Latin America ETF
9.18%13.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly higher than OTGL's 9.18% return.


COLO

1D
0.55%
1M
9.46%
YTD
12.04%
6M
28.16%
1Y
52.49%
3Y*
35.66%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
5.80%

OTGL

1D
1.20%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
9.18%
6M
17.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Global X MSCI Colombia ETF

OTG Latin America ETF

COLO vs. OTGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

COLO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than OTGL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COLO vs. OTGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLO
COLO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

OTGL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLO vs. OTGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLOOTGLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.73

COLO vs. OTGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COLOOTGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.84

-1.62

Correlation

The correlation between COLO and OTGL is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COLO vs. OTGL - Dividend Comparison

COLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than OTGL's 1.77% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
6.70%7.51%6.08%6.99%12.55%2.32%3.23%3.04%3.03%1.83%1.48%1.58%
OTGL
OTG Latin America ETF
1.77%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COLO vs. OTGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO drawdown since its inception was -78.91%, which is greater than OTGL's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO and OTGL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COLOOTGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.91%

-13.52%

-65.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.94%

-5.91%

-18.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-2.34%

-38.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

Volatility

COLO vs. OTGL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COLOOTGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

19.08%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.97%

19.08%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.33%

19.08%

+6.25%