COLO vs. FLMX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) and FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - COLO tracks the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index while FLMX tracks the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COLO returned 19.42%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for FLMX. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. COLO charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLMX.

Performance

COLO vs. FLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO achieves a 29.42% return, which is significantly higher than FLMX's 12.37% return.

COLO

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 8.84%
• 6M: 9.92%
• YTD: 29.42%
• 1Y: 65.61%
• 3Y*: 35.90%
• 5Y*: 19.42%
• 10Y*: 7.59%
• ALL TIME*: 6.02%

FLMX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 2.45%
• YTD: 12.37%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: 10.51%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	$6.53M	$6.51M	$9.10M
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	$237.66K	$216.97K	$406.60K

COLO vs. FLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	29.42%	68.88%	4.68%	24.92%	-21.32%	-11.50%	-14.60%	30.42%	-19.88%	7.75%
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	12.37%	53.62%	-28.45%	39.35%	2.40%	19.58%	-3.50%	12.13%	-13.32%	-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between COLO and FLMX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.47

COLO vs. FLMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COLO	FLMX
Financial Services	40.5%	20.3%
Utilities	19.6%	-
Basic Materials	18.4%	18.8%
Energy	15.2%	-
Communication Services	2.5%	8.4%
Industrials	2.0%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	29.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	7.4%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

COLO vs. FLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COLO

COLO Risk / Return Rank: 89
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FLMX

FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COLO vs. FLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COLO	FLMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	1.52	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.16	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.27	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	2.34	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	7.46	+2.50

COLO vs. FLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the FLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLO and FLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COLO vs. FLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO drawdown since its inception was -78.91%, which is greater than FLMX's maximum drawdown of -50.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO and FLMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COLO	FLMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.91%	-50.05%	-28.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.79%	-14.18%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	-31.72%	+13.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.86%	-31.72%	-12.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.14%	-4.48%	-7.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.10%	-11.92%	-28.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	4.44%	+2.17%

Volatility

COLO vs. FLMX - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COLO	FLMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	5.20%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.44%	17.93%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.43%	21.81%	+1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.31%	22.07%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.37%	24.60%	+0.77%

COLO vs. FLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COLO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

COLO vs. FLMX - Dividend Comparison

COLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than FLMX's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	4.34%	7.51%	6.08%	6.99%	12.55%	2.32%	3.23%	3.04%	3.03%	1.83%	1.48%	1.58%
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	3.81%	3.99%	3.31%	2.90%	4.22%	3.15%	1.48%	2.95%	2.51%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COLO and FLMX in my portfolio?

COLO and FLMX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COLO or FLMX?

COLO has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to FLMX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLO dropped -78.91% vs FLMX's -50.05%.

Which ETF is better, COLO or FLMX?

On 5-year performance, COLO leads with 19.42% vs 12.84% for FLMX. On fees, FLMX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLMX has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COLO or FLMX?

Over the 5-year period, COLO has performed better with a 19.42% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COLO or FLMX?

FLMX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COLO or FLMX?

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 3.81% for FLMX.

What is the main difference between COLO and FLMX?

COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index, while FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for COLO and 0.19% for FLMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.