PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIW vs. TSYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIW vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -36.41% return, which is significantly lower than TSYY's -20.53% return.


COIW

1D
2.84%
1M
-2.39%
6M
-41.28%
YTD
-36.41%
1Y
-71.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-41.30%

TSYY

1D
-2.37%
1M
-5.02%
6M
-19.96%
YTD
-20.53%
1Y
-15.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-24.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
-36.41%-25.92%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-20.53%-22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and TSYY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIW vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIWTSYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.93

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.52

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-0.90

-0.46

COIW vs. TSYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the TSYY Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and TSYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COIW vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and TSYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIWTSYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.01%

-41.52%

-33.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.56%

-29.54%

-45.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.21%

-39.68%

-31.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-26.72%

-14.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.97%

17.09%

+35.88%

Volatility

COIW vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 19.87% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 7.13%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIWTSYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.87%

7.13%

+12.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.94%

18.18%

+45.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.10%

30.15%

+51.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.47%

36.66%

+52.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.47%

36.66%

+52.81%

COIW vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYY's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIW vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 227.24%, less than TSYY's 250.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
227.24%120.37%0.00%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
250.98%256.64%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIW and TSYY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIW has higher volatility (19.87%) compared to TSYY (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -75.01% vs TSYY's -41.52%.

On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -15.32% vs -71.21% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -15.32% return vs -71.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 250.98%, compared with 227.24% for COIW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.15% for TSYY.

TSYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIW and TSYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer