PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIW vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIW vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -44.80% return, which is significantly lower than SMST's -5.14% return.


COIW

1D
-6.25%
1M
-25.28%
YTD
-44.80%
6M
-48.64%
1Y
-69.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
-44.80%-25.92%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-5.14%-6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and SMST is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

-0.76

The correlation between COIW and SMST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIW vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIWSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.30

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

2.79

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

5.52

-6.91

COIW vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COIW vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIWSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.01%

-99.25%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.01%

-85.39%

+10.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.01%

-96.27%

+21.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.52%

-90.74%

+51.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.83%

43.15%

+6.68%

Volatility

COIW vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) is 23.13%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 46.13%. This indicates that COIW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIWSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.13%

46.13%

-23.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.51%

130.40%

-66.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.07%

146.32%

-64.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.41%

167.25%

-76.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.41%

167.25%

-76.84%

COIW vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIW vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 270.96%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
270.96%120.37%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIW and SMST have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (46.13%) compared to COIW (23.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -75.01% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 236.89% vs -69.57% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, COIW has been the lower-risk option at 23.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 236.89% return vs -69.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 270.96%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIW and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer