COIW vs. OOSP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -58.88% vs 6.50% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.

Performance

COIW vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -37.10% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.66% return.

COIW

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: -17.85%
• YTD: -37.10%
• 6M: -42.22%
• 1Y: -58.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-37.10%	-25.92%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	2.66%	5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and OOSP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

COIW vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 3
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 4
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 3

OOSP

OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 72
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COIW	OOSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	1.79	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	2.60	-3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.38	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	4.97	-5.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	18.41	-19.60

COIW vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COIW vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and OOSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	COIW	OOSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.55%	-1.31%	-73.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.55%	-1.31%	-73.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.52%	0.00%	-71.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.31%	-0.20%	-39.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.39%	0.35%	+49.04%

Volatility

COIW vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 0.39%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COIW	OOSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.33%	0.39%	+21.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.06%	2.17%	+60.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.90%	3.65%	+79.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.36%	3.32%	+87.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.36%	3.32%	+87.04%

COIW vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

COIW vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 237.77%, more than OOSP's 6.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	237.77%	120.37%	0.00%
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF	6.45%	6.71%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COIW and OOSP in my portfolio?

COIW and OOSP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COIW or OOSP?

COIW has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to OOSP (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

Which ETF is better, COIW or OOSP?

On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.50% vs -58.88% for COIW. On fees, OOSP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COIW or OOSP?

Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.50% return vs -58.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COIW or OOSP?

OOSP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COIW or OOSP?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 237.77%, compared with 6.45% for OOSP.

What is the main difference between COIW and OOSP?

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.90% for OOSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.