PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIW vs. OOSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIW vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -34.53% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.41% return.


COIW

1D
-7.79%
1M
-23.73%
YTD
-34.53%
6M
-48.92%
1Y
-47.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.91%
YTD
2.41%
6M
2.51%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
-34.53%-23.77%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
2.41%5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and OOSP is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIW vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIWOOSPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

1.82

-2.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.52

2.64

-3.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.38

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

5.13

-5.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

19.01

-20.03

COIW vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIWOOSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

1.82

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

2.29

-2.75

Drawdowns

COIW vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and OOSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIWOOSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.55%

-1.31%

-73.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.55%

-1.31%

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.36%

-0.18%

-70.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-0.20%

-37.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.70%

0.35%

+46.35%

Volatility

COIW vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 22.46% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 1.23%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIWOOSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.46%

1.23%

+21.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.94%

2.23%

+59.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.90%

3.71%

+81.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.07%

3.35%

+87.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.07%

3.35%

+87.72%

COIW vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIW vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.68%, more than OOSP's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
226.68%120.37%0.00%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.47%6.71%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIW and OOSP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIW has higher volatility (22.46%) compared to OOSP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.71% vs -47.92% for COIW. On fees, OOSP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.71% return vs -47.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OOSP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 6.47% for OOSP.

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIW and OOSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer