COIW vs. ACYS
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
COIW vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COIW
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- -42.90%
- YTD
- -38.16%
- 1Y
- -71.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -29.40% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and ACYS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COIW vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COIW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COIW vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.01% | -0.63% | -74.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.00% | -0.15% | -71.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.87% | -0.14% | -40.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.78% | — | — |
Volatility
COIW vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.05% | 3.36% | +78.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.57% | 3.36% | +86.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.57% | 3.36% | +86.21% |
COIW vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIW vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 229.45%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 229.45% | 120.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and ACYS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 229.45%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for COIW and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer