COIN vs. ZM
COIN (Coinbase Global, Inc.) and ZM (Zoom Video Communications, Inc.) are both stocks. COIN operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while ZM operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, COIN returned -7.80%/yr vs -21.27%/yr for ZM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COIN vs. ZM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIN achieves a -32.61% return, which is significantly lower than ZM's 17.77% return.
COIN
- 1D
- -7.15%
- 1M
- -23.01%
- YTD
- -32.61%
- 6M
- -43.50%
- 1Y
- -37.59%
- 3Y*
- 43.47%
- 5Y*
- -7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ZM
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- 17.77%
- 6M
- 15.94%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- -21.27%
- 10Y*
- —
COIN vs. ZM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COIN Coinbase Global, Inc. | -32.61% | -8.92% | 42.77% | 391.44% | -85.98% | -23.12% |
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc. | 17.77% | 5.73% | 13.49% | 6.16% | -63.17% | -44.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIN and ZM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between COIN and ZM has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
COIN:
$40.35B
ZM:
$30.51B
COIN:
$2.90
ZM:
$6.79
COIN:
52.53
ZM:
14.97
COIN:
0.04
ZM:
0.11
COIN:
7.24
ZM:
6.28
COIN:
2.99
ZM:
3.06
COIN:
$5.81B
ZM:
$4.93B
COIN:
$4.65B
ZM:
$3.82B
COIN:
$1.68B
ZM:
$1.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIN vs. ZM — Risk / Return Rank
COIN
ZM
COIN vs. ZM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) and Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIN | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.03 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 2.84 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIN | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 0.61 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | -0.48 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.13 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
COIN vs. ZM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIN drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ZM drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIN and ZM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIN | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.90% | -90.27% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.39% | -24.42% | -41.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.39% | -25.45% | -40.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.90% | -86.21% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.70% | -82.12% | +18.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -62.82% | +12.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.06% | 8.99% | +31.07% |
Volatility
COIN vs. ZM - Volatility Comparison
Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) has a higher volatility of 20.16% compared to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) at 17.82%. This indicates that COIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIN | ZM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.16% | 17.82% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.15% | 34.16% | +16.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.37% | 41.30% | +29.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.87% | 44.43% | +41.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.38% | 54.52% | +30.86% |
Dividends
COIN vs. ZM - Dividend Comparison
Neither COIN nor ZM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
COIN vs. ZM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coinbase Global, Inc. and Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COIN vs. ZM - Profitability Comparison
COIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coinbase Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.1%.
ZM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a gross profit of 964.72M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.
COIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coinbase Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.15M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
ZM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.47M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
COIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coinbase Global, Inc. reported a net income of -394.12M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of -27.9%.
ZM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a net income of 425.68M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 34.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COIN and ZM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIN has higher volatility (20.16%) compared to ZM (17.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIN dropped -90.90% vs ZM's -90.27%.
ZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIN and ZM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer