COII.L vs. MSTI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP (MSTI.L).
COII.L and MSTI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COII.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024. MSTI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.
Performance
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | -43.33% | -42.62% |
MSTI.L IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP | -38.98% | -60.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
COII.L is traded in GBp, while MSTI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSTI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COII.L achieves a -43.33% return, which is significantly lower than MSTI.L's -38.98% return.
COII.L
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -43.33%
- 6M
- -66.12%
- 1Y
- -60.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTI.L
- 1D
- -7.38%
- 1M
- -14.36%
- YTD
- -38.98%
- 6M
- -72.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COII.L and MSTI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Return for Risk
COII.L vs. MSTI.L — Risk / Return Rank
COII.L
MSTI.L
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP (MSTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COII.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COII.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.85 | -1.38 | +0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between COII.L and MSTI.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Dividend Comparison
COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 168.09%, more than MSTI.L's 0.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | 129.31% | 191.72% | 18.99% |
MSTI.L IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COII.L drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, smaller than the maximum MSTI.L drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII.L and MSTI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COII.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.00% | -80.37% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.46% | -80.37% | +5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -46.87% | +17.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.52% | — | — |
Volatility
COII.L vs. MSTI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COII.L | MSTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.07% | 61.32% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 61.32% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.47% | 61.32% | -1.85% |