MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP (MSTI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L).

MSTI.L and QQQO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSTI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025. QQQO.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Aug 27, 2024.

Performance

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP (MSTI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTI.L IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP	-40.12%	-61.38%
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP	-4.55%	9.79%

Different Trading Currencies

MSTI.L is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTI.L achieves a -40.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQO.L's -4.55% return.

MSTI.L

• 1D: -7.11%
• 1M: -16.01%
• YTD: -40.12%
• 6M: -72.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQO.L

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -1.75%
• 1Y: 18.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

MSTI.L

IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP

QQQO.L

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP

Return for Risk

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQO.L

QQQO.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
QQQO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QQQO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QQQO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QQQO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP (MSTI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTI.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.40	0.61	-2.00

Correlation

The correlation between MSTI.L and QQQO.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

MSTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than QQQO.L's 116.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
MSTI.L IncomeShares Microstrategy (MSTR) Options ETP	0.74%	0.16%	0.00%
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP	116.47%	124.53%	17.93%

Drawdowns

MSTI.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTI.L drawdown since its inception was -80.37%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTI.L and QQQO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTI.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.37%	-21.70%	-58.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.37%	-5.11%	-75.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.87%	-4.79%	-42.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTI.L	QQQO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.31%	17.05%	+44.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.31%	17.13%	+44.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.31%	17.13%	+44.18%