PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COII.L vs. WINC.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-43.33%-47.27%15.90%
WINC.AS
iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc
-0.85%13.28%5.89%
Different Trading Currencies

COII.L is traded in GBp, while WINC.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WINC.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COII.L achieves a -43.33% return, which is significantly lower than WINC.AS's -0.85% return.


COII.L

1D
1.92%
1M
-12.66%
YTD
-43.33%
6M
-66.12%
1Y
-60.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WINC.AS

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
3.70%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

COII.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WINC.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COII.L vs. WINC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

WINC.AS
WINC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COII.LWINC.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.02

1.25

-2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.60

1.72

-3.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.25

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

1.59

-2.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.54

7.26

-8.80

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COII.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the WINC.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COII.L and WINC.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COII.LWINC.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

1.25

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.85

0.99

-1.83

Correlation

The correlation between COII.L and WINC.AS is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Dividend Comparison

COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 168.09%, more than WINC.AS's 9.72% yield.


Drawdowns

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COII.L drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, which is greater than WINC.AS's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COII.L and WINC.AS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COII.LWINC.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.00%

-14.81%

-61.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.77%

-10.81%

-63.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.46%

-6.13%

-68.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.84%

-1.60%

-28.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.52%

2.07%

+37.45%

Volatility

COII.L vs. WINC.AS - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a higher volatility of 17.50% compared to iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) at 4.70%. This indicates that COII.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COII.LWINC.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.50%

4.70%

+12.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.63%

8.03%

+37.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.07%

13.36%

+45.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.47%

13.37%

+46.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.47%

13.37%

+46.10%