PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -61.94% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.38% return.


COIG

1D
-0.23%
1M
-34.67%
YTD
-61.94%
6M
-74.70%
1Y
-78.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.01%
YTD
5.38%
6M
6.35%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COIG and XTJL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.60

The correlation between COIG and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIGXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.46

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

3.06

-3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

17.30

-18.49

COIG vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIGXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

2.11

-2.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.65

-1.05

Drawdowns

COIG vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.06%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.06%

-23.24%

-68.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.06%

-5.12%

-86.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.44%

0.00%

-91.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.83%

-4.04%

-47.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.13%

0.90%

+65.23%

Volatility

COIG vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 37.76% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.76%

0.31%

+37.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.15%

5.72%

+94.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.95%

7.42%

+131.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.21%

15.21%

+131.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.21%

15.21%

+131.00%

COIG vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIG vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither COIG nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and XTJL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (37.76%) compared to XTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.06% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 15.58% vs -78.85% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 15.58% return vs -78.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.

COIG and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer