PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -67.38% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -33.05% return.


COIG

1D
-14.29%
1M
-44.01%
YTD
-67.38%
6M
-77.55%
1Y
-80.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-13.33%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
-33.05%
6M
-35.69%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COIG and TSLG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIGTSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.14

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

0.68

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

1.40

-2.61

COIG vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIGTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.42

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

-0.40

-0.03

Drawdowns

COIG vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.67%

-82.86%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.67%

-54.61%

-38.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.67%

-66.18%

-26.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-58.75%

+6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.38%

26.25%

+40.13%

Volatility

COIG vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 39.97% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) at 28.25%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.97%

28.25%

+11.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.60%

55.82%

+44.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.64%

93.25%

+46.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.55%

115.55%

+31.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.55%

115.55%

+31.00%

COIG vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COIG and TSLG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

COIG vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and TSLG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (39.97%) compared to TSLG (28.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.67% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 36.71% vs -80.06% for COIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLG has been the lower-risk option at 28.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 36.71% return vs -80.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG and TSLG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.78%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer