PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. PLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -73.05% return, which is significantly lower than PLTG's -63.05% return.


COIG

1D
-21.82%
1M
-26.28%
6M
-62.23%
YTD
-73.05%
1Y
-88.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-64.35%

PLTG

1D
1.90%
1M
-11.61%
6M
-44.23%
YTD
-63.05%
1Y
-58.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.05M$858.94K$991.71K
$2.36M$3.34M$5.05M

COIG vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COIG and PLTG is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.52

The correlation between COIG and PLTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTG
PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COIG vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIGPLTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.94

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

-0.76

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-1.23

-0.13

COIG vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the PLTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and PLTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COIG vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -93.94%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and PLTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGPLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.94%

-80.11%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.96%

-80.11%

-11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.94%

-74.89%

-19.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.23%

-35.51%

-20.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.49%

49.28%

+21.21%

Volatility

COIG vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 41.31% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) at 27.31%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGPLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.31%

27.31%

+14.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

108.39%

82.19%

+26.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.96%

104.68%

+33.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.17%

105.88%

+39.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.17%

105.88%

+39.29%

COIG vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COIG and PLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

COIG vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and PLTG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (41.31%) compared to PLTG (27.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -93.94% vs PLTG's -80.11%.

On 1-year performance, PLTG leads with -58.52% vs -88.75% for COIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTG has been the lower-risk option at 27.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTG has performed better with a -58.52% return vs -88.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG and PLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.09%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

PLTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and PLTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer