COIG vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIG returned -85.23% vs 2279.34% for INTW. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

COIG vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -62.75% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.

COIG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -24.51%
• YTD: -62.75%
• 6M: -69.27%
• 1Y: -85.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: 10.59%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 871.59%
• 6M: 897.00%
• 1Y: 2,279.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF	-62.75%	-10.62%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	871.59%	68.55%

Correlation

The correlation between COIG and INTW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

COIG vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG

COIG Risk / Return Rank: 3
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COIG	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	15.45	-16.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.05	5.37	-6.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.68	-0.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	46.81	-47.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	106.28	-107.52

COIG vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COIG vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	COIG	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.67%	-60.58%	-32.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-92.67%	-49.34%	-43.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.63%	0.00%	-91.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.05%	-29.71%	-23.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	68.85%	21.69%	+47.16%

Volatility

COIG vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) is 35.76%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that COIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COIG	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.76%	53.88%	-18.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.76%	118.13%	-16.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	135.60%	149.77%	-14.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.26%	148.63%	-3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.26%	148.63%	-3.37%

COIG vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

COIG vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither COIG nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COIG and INTW in my portfolio?

COIG and INTW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COIG or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to COIG (35.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.67% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, COIG or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs -85.23% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, COIG has been the lower-risk option at 35.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COIG or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs -85.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COIG or INTW?

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COIG or INTW?

COIG and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between COIG and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.