COIG vs. GMEU
COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) and GMEU (T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIG returned -80.06% vs -69.08% for GMEU. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for GMEU.
Performance
COIG vs. GMEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -67.38% return, which is significantly lower than GMEU's -4.94% return.
COIG
- 1D
- -14.29%
- 1M
- -44.01%
- YTD
- -67.38%
- 6M
- -77.55%
- 1Y
- -80.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMEU
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- -28.19%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -29.47%
- 1Y
- -69.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG vs. GMEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -67.38% | -21.33% |
GMEU T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF | -4.94% | -65.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIG and GMEU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIG vs. GMEU — Risk / Return Rank
COIG
GMEU
COIG vs. GMEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIG | GMEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.85 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.95 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -1.20 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIG | GMEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | -0.81 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.71 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
COIG vs. GMEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than GMEU's maximum drawdown of -80.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and GMEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIG | GMEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.67% | -80.43% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.67% | -72.75% | -19.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.67% | -78.93% | -13.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -63.30% | +11.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.38% | 57.36% | +9.02% |
Volatility
COIG vs. GMEU - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 39.97% compared to T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) at 23.03%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIG | GMEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.97% | 23.03% | +16.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.60% | 57.67% | +42.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.64% | 85.25% | +54.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.55% | 89.72% | +56.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.55% | 89.72% | +56.83% |
COIG vs. GMEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GMEU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIG vs. GMEU - Dividend Comparison
Neither COIG nor GMEU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COIG and GMEU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIG has higher volatility (39.97%) compared to GMEU (23.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.67% vs GMEU's -80.43%.
On 1-year performance, GMEU leads with -69.08% vs -80.06% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GMEU has been the lower-risk option at 23.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GMEU has performed better with a -69.08% return vs -80.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.
COIG and GMEU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 1.50% for GMEU.
COIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIG and GMEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer