PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. GMEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. GMEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -67.38% return, which is significantly lower than GMEU's -4.94% return.


COIG

1D
-14.29%
1M
-44.01%
YTD
-67.38%
6M
-77.55%
1Y
-80.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMEU

1D
-4.61%
1M
-28.19%
YTD
-4.94%
6M
-29.47%
1Y
-69.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. GMEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF
-67.38%-21.33%
GMEU
T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF
-4.94%-65.56%

Correlation

The correlation between COIG and GMEU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. GMEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GMEU
GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. GMEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIGGMEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.85

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.95

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

-1.20

0.00

COIG vs. GMEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the GMEU Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and GMEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIGGMEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

-0.81

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

-0.71

+0.28

Drawdowns

COIG vs. GMEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than GMEU's maximum drawdown of -80.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and GMEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGGMEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.67%

-80.43%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.67%

-72.75%

-19.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.67%

-78.93%

-13.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-63.30%

+11.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.38%

57.36%

+9.02%

Volatility

COIG vs. GMEU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 39.97% compared to T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) at 23.03%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGGMEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.97%

23.03%

+16.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.60%

57.67%

+42.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.64%

85.25%

+54.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.55%

89.72%

+56.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.55%

89.72%

+56.83%

COIG vs. GMEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GMEU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIG vs. GMEU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COIG nor GMEU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and GMEU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (39.97%) compared to GMEU (23.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.67% vs GMEU's -80.43%.

On 1-year performance, GMEU leads with -69.08% vs -80.06% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GMEU has been the lower-risk option at 23.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GMEU has performed better with a -69.08% return vs -80.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

COIG and GMEU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 1.50% for GMEU.

COIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and GMEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer