PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. FLSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -62.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLSP's 2.34% return.


COIG

1D
1.70%
1M
-24.51%
YTD
-62.75%
6M
-69.27%
1Y
-85.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLSP

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.95%
YTD
2.34%
6M
3.30%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
10.46%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COIG and FLSP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COIGFLSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.30

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

3.94

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

11.39

-12.62

COIG vs. FLSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the FLSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and FLSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COIG vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than FLSP's maximum drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and FLSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGFLSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.67%

-22.75%

-69.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.67%

-4.03%

-88.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.63%

-0.90%

-90.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-6.26%

-46.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.85%

1.39%

+67.46%

Volatility

COIG vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a higher volatility of 35.76% compared to Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) at 1.74%. This indicates that COIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGFLSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.76%

1.74%

+34.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.76%

6.77%

+94.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.60%

9.08%

+126.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.26%

13.35%

+131.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.26%

13.48%

+131.78%

COIG vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIG vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison

COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.59%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and FLSP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (35.76%) compared to FLSP (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.67% vs FLSP's -22.75%.

On 1-year performance, FLSP leads with 15.79% vs -85.23% for COIG. On fees, FLSP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 15.79% return vs -85.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COIG.

FLSP has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

COIG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COIG and 0.65% for FLSP.

FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and FLSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer