PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIG vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIG achieves a -67.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 258.39% return.


COIG

1D
-14.29%
1M
-44.01%
YTD
-67.38%
6M
-77.55%
1Y
-80.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDG

1D
-21.69%
1M
15.58%
YTD
258.39%
6M
240.36%
1Y
855.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COIG and AMDG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIGAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.56

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

15.29

-16.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

29.88

-31.09

COIG vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 6.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIG and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIGAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

6.56

-7.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

2.45

-2.88

Drawdowns

COIG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIG drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIG and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIGAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.67%

-63.04%

-29.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.67%

-56.48%

-36.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.67%

-27.01%

-65.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-25.65%

-26.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.38%

28.85%

+37.53%

Volatility

COIG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) is 39.97%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 44.53%. This indicates that COIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIGAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.97%

44.53%

-4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

100.60%

98.53%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.64%

131.87%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.55%

131.49%

+15.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.55%

131.49%

+15.06%

COIG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COIG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

COIG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COIG and AMDG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDG has higher volatility (44.53%) compared to COIG (39.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIG dropped -92.67% vs AMDG's -63.04%.

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 855.10% vs -80.06% for COIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, COIG has been the lower-risk option at 39.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 855.10% return vs -80.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIG and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer