PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COHR vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COHR vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COHR achieves a 117.77% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -57.47% return.


COHR

1D
6.62%
1M
19.89%
YTD
117.77%
6M
116.25%
1Y
404.05%
3Y*
117.79%
5Y*
41.61%
10Y*
35.09%

GDXU

1D
-0.54%
1M
-49.20%
YTD
-57.47%
6M
-46.20%
1Y
38.54%
3Y*
35.00%
5Y*
-14.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COHR vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
117.77%94.84%117.62%24.02%-48.63%-10.04%10.09%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-57.47%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between COHR and GDXU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COHR vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COHR vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COHRGDXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.18

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.36

0.48

+14.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.88

1.04

+41.84

COHR vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COHR Sharpe Ratio is 5.62, which is higher than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COHR and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COHRGDXUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62

0.28

+5.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

-0.13

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-0.13

+0.46

Drawdowns

COHR vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COHR drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHR and GDXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COHRGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-94.39%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.52%

-80.26%

+53.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.85%

-80.26%

+25.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.87%

-92.93%

+30.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-80.26%

+74.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-69.78%

+34.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.48%

37.20%

-27.72%

Volatility

COHR vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coherent, Inc. (COHR) is 28.41%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 50.50%. This indicates that COHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COHRGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.41%

50.50%

-22.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.90%

122.03%

-66.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.65%

140.25%

-67.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.36%

111.49%

-50.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.43%

110.52%

-54.09%

Dividends

COHR vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COHR nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COHR and GDXU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (50.50%) compared to COHR (28.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COHR dropped -80.89% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COHR and GDXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer