PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COHR vs. CCNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COHR vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COHR achieves a 124.22% return, which is significantly higher than CCNR's 21.64% return.


COHR

1D
7.48%
1M
8.21%
YTD
124.22%
6M
131.91%
1Y
434.88%
3Y*
96.11%
5Y*
43.17%
10Y*
35.53%

CCNR

1D
-0.23%
1M
-3.64%
YTD
21.64%
6M
23.54%
1Y
54.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COHR vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
124.22%94.84%23.75%
CCNR
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
21.64%46.48%-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between COHR and CCNR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COHR vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COHR
COHR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
COHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
COHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CCNR
CCNR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CCNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CCNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COHR vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COHRCCNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.50

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.54

7.01

+9.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.32

24.58

+20.74

COHR vs. CCNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COHR Sharpe Ratio is 5.94, which is higher than the CCNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COHR and CCNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COHR vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COHR drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHR and CCNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COHRCCNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-20.06%

-60.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.52%

-7.85%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-5.43%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-3.59%

-31.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.66%

2.23%

+7.43%

Volatility

COHR vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison

Coherent, Inc. (COHR) has a higher volatility of 28.85% compared to ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) at 6.77%. This indicates that COHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COHRCCNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.85%

6.77%

+22.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.84%

13.89%

+43.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.98%

18.68%

+55.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.69%

20.12%

+41.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.62%

20.12%

+36.50%

Dividends

COHR vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison

COHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.


PositionTTM20252024
CCNR
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
2.86%3.48%1.27%
COHR
Coherent, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COHR and CCNR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COHR has higher volatility (28.85%) compared to CCNR (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COHR dropped -80.89% vs CCNR's -20.06%.

COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COHR and CCNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer