PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COFYX vs. GQHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFYX achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than GQHPX's 7.21% return.


COFYX

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.74%
YTD
8.31%
6M
7.55%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
15.75%

GQHPX

1D
0.36%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
7.21%
6M
7.36%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COFYX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.31%17.49%23.49%32.22%-18.51%7.26%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
7.21%7.53%12.69%3.94%6.73%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between COFYX and GQHPX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.50

The correlation between COFYX and GQHPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COFYX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFYX
COFYX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
COFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
COFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GQHPX
GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COFYXGQHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.51

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.98

4.40

+5.57

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFYX and GQHPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFYX drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFYX and GQHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COFYXGQHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.43%

-17.26%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-6.50%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-8.71%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-6.17%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-3.35%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.22%

+0.26%

Volatility

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class (COFYX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 3.96%. This indicates that COFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COFYXGQHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

3.96%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

8.18%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

10.24%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

12.68%

+6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

12.68%

+6.41%

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COFYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

COFYX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

COFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than GQHPX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COFYX
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Institutional 3 Class
6.71%7.27%9.52%3.11%10.48%13.50%7.65%10.86%10.15%4.82%0.75%5.96%
GQHPX
GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.71%2.98%3.14%2.64%3.24%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COFYX and GQHPX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COFYX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GQHPX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COFYX dropped -32.43% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.

COFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COFYX and GQHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer