PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COFA.PA vs. UNCFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Coface SA (COFA.PA) and UniCredit S.p.A (UNCFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COFA.PA is traded in EUR, while UNCFF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UNCFF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFA.PA achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than UNCFF's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, COFA.PA has underperformed UNCFF with an annualized return of 15.23%, while UNCFF has yielded a comparatively higher 49.43% annualized return.


COFA.PA

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.07%
YTD
0.75%
6M
6.44%
1Y
-2.18%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
15.23%

UNCFF

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.28%
YTD
4.98%
6M
14.06%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
71.31%
5Y*
59.16%
10Y*
49.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COFA.PA
Coface SA
0.75%18.76%32.23%9.37%10.26%60.81%-25.16%51.40%-7.91%45.19%
UNCFF
UniCredit S.p.A
4.98%95.26%80.29%110.88%2.88%98.97%-35.17%34.84%-33.67%475.51%

Correlation

The correlation between COFA.PA and UNCFF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.20

The correlation between COFA.PA and UNCFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFA.PA
COFA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
COFA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

UNCFF
UNCFF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UNCFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNCFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNCFF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UNCFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNCFF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coface SA (COFA.PA) and UniCredit S.p.A (UNCFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COFA.PAUNCFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.15

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

1.13

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

3.18

-3.46

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFA.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the UNCFF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFA.PA and UNCFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COFA.PAUNCFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

0.78

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.37

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.17

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.07

+0.21

Drawdowns

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFA.PA drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, smaller than the maximum UNCFF drawdown of -89.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFA.PA and UNCFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COFA.PAUNCFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-89.22%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-25.90%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-25.90%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.21%

-47.23%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.63%

-75.86%

+12.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-6.27%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.95%

-40.26%

+23.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

9.17%

-1.62%

Volatility

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coface SA (COFA.PA) is 4.06%, while UniCredit S.p.A (UNCFF) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that COFA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNCFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COFA.PAUNCFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

9.51%

-5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

29.42%

-17.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

37.23%

-19.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.44%

43.51%

-18.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.00%

285.04%

-252.04%

Dividends

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Dividend Comparison

COFA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than UNCFF's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COFA.PA
Coface SA
8.56%8.92%9.04%12.84%12.36%4.39%0.00%7.20%4.29%0.79%7.74%5.14%
UNCFF
UniCredit S.p.A
2.39%4.05%14.49%7.87%4.13%7.24%7.36%4.20%6.21%0.00%4.21%0.00%

Financials

COFA.PA vs. UNCFF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coface SA and UniCredit S.p.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. COFA.PA values in EUR, UNCFF values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


COFA.PA and UNCFF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COFA.PA and UNCFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer