UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI
Compare and contrast key facts about UniCredit S.p.A (UNCFF) and Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (BMPS.MI).
Performance
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNCFF UniCredit S.p.A | -10.10% | 121.55% | 69.13% | 117.40% | -3.13% | 85.12% | -29.35% | 31.86% | -36.64% | 556.15% |
BMPS.MI Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA | -17.77% | 69.49% | 121.10% | 63.27% | -90.22% | -21.20% | -18.11% | -8.49% | -63.59% | -70.37% |
Different Trading Currencies
UNCFF is traded in USD, while BMPS.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BMPS.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNCFF achieves a -10.10% return, which is significantly higher than BMPS.MI's -17.77% return. Over the past 10 years, UNCFF has outperformed BMPS.MI with an annualized return of 45.14%, while BMPS.MI has yielded a comparatively lower -37.74% annualized return.
UNCFF
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- -10.10%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 77.05%
- 5Y*
- 62.86%
- 10Y*
- 45.14%
BMPS.MI
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- YTD
- -17.77%
- 6M
- -3.13%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 68.27%
- 5Y*
- -18.65%
- 10Y*
- -37.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI — Risk / Return Rank
UNCFF
BMPS.MI
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UniCredit S.p.A (UNCFF) and Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (BMPS.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNCFF | BMPS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.61 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.07 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 0.87 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 2.38 | +2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNCFF | BMPS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.61 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.40 | -0.36 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | -0.63 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.59 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNCFF and BMPS.MI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Dividend Comparison
UNCFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than BMPS.MI's 11.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNCFF UniCredit S.p.A | 4.50% | 4.05% | 14.49% | 7.87% | 4.13% | 7.24% | 7.36% | 4.20% | 6.21% | 0.00% | 4.21% |
BMPS.MI Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA | 11.31% | 9.42% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNCFF drawdown since its inception was -90.39%, smaller than the maximum BMPS.MI drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNCFF and BMPS.MI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNCFF | BMPS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.39% | -100.00% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.72% | -25.49% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.18% | -93.88% | +41.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.71% | -99.89% | +24.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.86% | -100.00% | +79.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.88% | -72.19% | +31.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 9.69% | -0.99% |
Volatility
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Volatility Comparison
UniCredit S.p.A (UNCFF) has a higher volatility of 15.29% compared to Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (BMPS.MI) at 11.35%. This indicates that UNCFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMPS.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNCFF | BMPS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.29% | 11.35% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.06% | 25.29% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.25% | 37.57% | +4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.02% | 51.89% | -6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 286.97% | 59.11% | +227.86% |
Financials
UNCFF vs. BMPS.MI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UniCredit S.p.A and Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities