PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Coface SA (COFA.PA) and Carmila SA (CARM.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFA.PA achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than CARM.PA's 6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, COFA.PA has outperformed CARM.PA with an annualized return of 21.21%, while CARM.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.


COFA.PA

1D
0.25%
1M
6.31%
6M
12.94%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
20.32%
10Y*
21.21%
ALL TIME*
10.86%

CARM.PA

1D
0.12%
1M
0.73%
6M
10.28%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
4.84%
ALL TIME*
-2.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COFA.PA
Coface SA
11.50%18.76%32.23%9.37%10.26%60.81%-25.16%51.41%-7.87%46.37%
CARM.PA
Carmila SA
6.26%13.60%10.70%27.03%3.23%26.40%-30.14%35.03%-28.69%9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between COFA.PA and CARM.PA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2014

0.22

The correlation between COFA.PA and CARM.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFA.PA
COFA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
COFA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CARM.PA
CARM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CARM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CARM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coface SA (COFA.PA) and Carmila SA (CARM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COFA.PACARM.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

0.48

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

0.93

-0.28

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFA.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the CARM.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFA.PA and CARM.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFA.PA drawdown since its inception was -63.61%, smaller than the maximum CARM.PA drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFA.PA and CARM.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COFA.PACARM.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.61%

-83.46%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-14.63%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-18.03%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.21%

-25.90%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.61%

-78.30%

+14.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.01%

+35.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-59.85%

+43.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

7.62%

-0.11%

Volatility

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Volatility Comparison

Coface SA (COFA.PA) and Carmila SA (CARM.PA) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COFA.PACARM.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.45%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

13.39%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

18.22%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.05%

26.81%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.42%

35.80%

-4.38%

Dividends

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Dividend Comparison

COFA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, less than CARM.PA's 8.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARM.PA
Carmila SA
8.19%7.35%7.49%7.51%7.50%7.22%15.87%7.50%3.71%10.36%6.57%5.70%
COFA.PA
Coface SA
7.73%8.92%9.04%12.84%12.36%4.39%0.00%7.20%4.29%1.46%7.74%5.14%

Financials

COFA.PA vs. CARM.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coface SA and Carmila SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


COFA.PA and CARM.PA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COFA.PA and CARM.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer