CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CARM.PA (Carmila SA) and RBO.PA (Roche Bobois S.A.) are both stocks. CARM.PA operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while RBO.PA operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, CARM.PA returned 11.94%/yr vs 6.73%/yr for RBO.PA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Carmila SA (CARM.PA) and Roche Bobois S.A. (RBO.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARM.PA achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than RBO.PA's -19.55% return.

CARM.PA

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 1.40%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: 3.14%

RBO.PA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: -19.55%
• 6M: -28.29%
• 1Y: -36.53%
• 3Y*: -13.83%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CARM.PA Carmila SA	3.19%	13.60%	10.70%	27.03%	3.23%	26.40%	-35.71%	27.23%	-32.10%
RBO.PA Roche Bobois S.A.	-19.55%	-16.18%	-25.43%	56.98%	1.42%	95.23%	12.00%	2.75%	-13.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CARM.PA and RBO.PA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018	0.08

Return for Risk

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARM.PA

CARM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 40
CARM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CARM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CARM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CARM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CARM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RBO.PA

RBO.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4
RBO.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
RBO.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
RBO.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
RBO.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RBO.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carmila SA (CARM.PA) and Roche Bobois S.A. (RBO.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARM.PA	RBO.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-1.28	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	-1.86	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.77	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	-0.86	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.18	-1.56	+1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARM.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the RBO.PA Sharpe Ratio of -1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARM.PA and RBO.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARM.PA	RBO.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	-1.28	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.22	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.17	-0.07

Drawdowns

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARM.PA drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than RBO.PA's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARM.PA and RBO.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARM.PA	RBO.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.77%	-54.44%	-38.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.63%	-41.84%	+27.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.03%	-54.44%	+36.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.90%	-54.44%	+28.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.43%	-50.28%	-22.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.52%	-18.54%	-59.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.59%	23.18%	-15.59%

Volatility

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carmila SA (CARM.PA) is 6.61%, while Roche Bobois S.A. (RBO.PA) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that CARM.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBO.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARM.PA	RBO.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.61%	7.90%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	23.03%	-9.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.85%	28.14%	-8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.13%	30.62%	-3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.92%	33.99%	-0.07%

Dividends

CARM.PA vs. RBO.PA - Dividend Comparison

CARM.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, more than RBO.PA's 4.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CARM.PA Carmila SA	8.44%	7.35%	7.49%	7.51%	7.50%	7.22%	8.49%	2.45%	4.64%	10.98%	6.57%	5.27%
RBO.PA Roche Bobois S.A.	4.98%	4.01%	3.25%	4.25%	5.63%	1.34%	0.51%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARM.PA and RBO.PA in my portfolio?

CARM.PA and RBO.PA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.