PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COBYX vs. BESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COBYX vs. BESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COBYX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than BESIX's 22.17% return. Over the past 10 years, COBYX has underperformed BESIX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while BESIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.


COBYX

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.68%
YTD
9.83%
6M
12.54%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.70%

BESIX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
22.17%
6M
24.20%
1Y
41.81%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COBYX vs. BESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
9.83%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%
BESIX
William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
22.17%13.93%8.37%22.25%-27.95%15.52%32.60%20.58%-23.29%40.54%

Correlation

The correlation between COBYX and BESIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between COBYX and BESIX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COBYX vs. BESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BESIX
BESIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COBYX vs. BESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) and William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COBYXBESIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.82

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.05

12.64

-7.60

COBYX vs. BESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the BESIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COBYX and BESIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COBYXBESIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.45

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.46

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.61

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Drawdowns

COBYX vs. BESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COBYX drawdown since its inception was -34.18%, smaller than the maximum BESIX drawdown of -38.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COBYX and BESIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COBYXBESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.18%

-38.05%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-11.45%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-21.34%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

-31.41%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

-38.05%

+3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.42%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-10.19%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.44%

-0.45%

Volatility

COBYX vs. BESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) is 3.71%, while William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (BESIX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that COBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COBYXBESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

6.13%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

14.87%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

17.88%

-6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

15.03%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

16.24%

-2.60%

COBYX vs. BESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COBYX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BESIX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

COBYX vs. BESIX - Dividend Comparison

COBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than BESIX's 7.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BESIX
William Blair Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
7.80%9.53%0.00%0.26%4.84%8.51%0.04%0.16%2.32%3.17%2.67%4.17%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.07%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COBYX and BESIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BESIX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to COBYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COBYX dropped -34.18% vs BESIX's -38.05%.

BESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COBYX and BESIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer