COAL vs. THNQ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

COAL (Range Global Coal Index ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COAL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the VettaFi Global Coal Index, while THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COAL returned 26.17% vs 63.59% for THNQ. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COAL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

COAL vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COAL achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 38.89% return.

COAL

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -10.50%
• 6M: -7.26%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

THNQ

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: 33.76%
• YTD: 38.89%
• 1Y: 63.59%
• 3Y*: 33.59%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COAL vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COAL Range Global Coal Index ETF	3.51%	12.65%	-17.23%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	38.89%	29.83%	16.11%

Correlation

The correlation between COAL and THNQ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.31

COAL vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COAL	THNQ
Energy	48.2%	-
Basic Materials	45.0%	-
Industrials	6.9%	0.8%
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	5.2%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Technology	-	74.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

COAL vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COAL

COAL Risk / Return Rank: 30
COAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
COAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
COAL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
COAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
COAL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 79
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COAL vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COAL	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	2.19	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.73	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	3.47	-2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.16	10.69	-7.52

COAL vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COAL and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COAL vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COAL drawdown since its inception was -42.29%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COAL and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COAL	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.29%	-50.56%	+8.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.69%	-18.39%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.87%	-5.71%	-11.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.30%	-14.91%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.30%	5.97%	+2.33%

Volatility

COAL vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Range Global Coal Index ETF (COAL) is 7.75%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that COAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COAL	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.75%	10.29%	-2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.14%	23.87%	-1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.74%	29.15%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.70%	29.65%	-1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.70%	28.92%	-1.22%

COAL vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COAL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

COAL vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

COAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COAL Range Global Coal Index ETF	2.54%	2.63%	1.80%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COAL and THNQ in my portfolio?

COAL and THNQ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COAL or THNQ?

THNQ has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to COAL (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COAL dropped -42.29% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, COAL or THNQ?

On 1-year performance, THNQ leads with 63.59% vs 26.17% for COAL. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, COAL has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COAL or THNQ?

Over the 1-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 63.59% return vs 26.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COAL or THNQ?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for COAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COAL or THNQ?

COAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between COAL and THNQ?

COAL is categorized as Energy Equities, while THNQ is Technology Equities. COAL tracks VettaFi Global Coal Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for COAL and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.