PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COA.L vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COA.L vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coats Group plc (COA.L) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COA.L is traded in GBp, while C is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the C values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COA.L achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than C's 15.81% return. Over the past 10 years, COA.L has underperformed C with an annualized return of 12.81%, while C has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.


COA.L

1D
-0.81%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
0.08%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
12.81%

C

1D
-1.37%
1M
5.79%
YTD
15.81%
6M
22.80%
1Y
79.79%
3Y*
42.31%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COA.L vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COA.L
Coats Group plc
-3.71%-7.55%25.32%20.17%-1.59%5.14%-9.79%-6.97%-7.24%65.96%
C
Citigroup Inc.
15.81%58.24%44.41%13.04%-12.83%1.89%-22.06%51.82%-24.25%16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between COA.L and C is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2015

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COA.L:

£1.59B

C:

$235.27B

EPS

COA.L:

£0.10

C:

$8.65

PE Ratio

COA.L:

7.85

C:

15.32

PS Ratio

COA.L:

0.49

C:

1.43

PB Ratio

COA.L:

2.20

C:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

COA.L:

£2.97B

C:

$171.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COA.L:

£1.07B

C:

$77.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

COA.L:

£543.24M

C:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COA.L vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COA.L
COA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
COA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
COA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
COA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
COA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COA.L vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coats Group plc (COA.L) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COA.LCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.45

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

6.30

-5.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

17.37

-16.62

COA.L vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COA.L and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COA.LCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

2.89

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.57

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.48

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.06

+0.46

Drawdowns

COA.L vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COA.L drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -96.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COA.L and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COA.LCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.37%

-96.99%

+37.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

-12.73%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

-32.91%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.33%

-38.51%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.37%

-51.14%

-8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-43.68%

+24.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-78.37%

+63.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

4.61%

+2.97%

Volatility

COA.L vs. C - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Coats Group plc (COA.L) is 6.07%, while Citigroup Inc. (C) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that COA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COA.LCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

8.49%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.62%

22.47%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.30%

27.79%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.07%

28.12%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.22%

32.58%

+1.64%

Dividends

COA.L vs. C - Dividend Comparison

COA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than C's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.81%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
COA.L
Coats Group plc
3.08%2.82%2.45%2.64%2.75%1.99%0.00%1.77%1.39%1.10%0.00%0.00%

Financials

COA.L vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coats Group plc and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202120222023202420252026
763.15M
44.14B
(COA.L) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. COA.L values in GBp, C values in USD

COA.L vs. C - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coats Group plc and Citigroup Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
36.9%
49.3%
Portfolio components
COA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coats Group plc reported a gross profit of 281.44M and revenue of 763.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

COA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coats Group plc reported an operating income of 113.54M and revenue of 763.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

COA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coats Group plc reported a net income of 44.31M and revenue of 763.15M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COA.L and C have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COA.L and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer