PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COA.L vs. ACFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COA.L vs. ACFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coats Group plc (COA.L) and Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COA.L is traded in GBp, while ACFN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACFN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COA.L achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than ACFN's 6.62% return.


COA.L

1D
-0.81%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
0.08%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
12.81%

ACFN

1D
-3.95%
1M
-16.06%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COA.L vs. ACFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COA.L
Coats Group plc
-3.71%11.49%
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
6.62%-15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between COA.L and ACFN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COA.L:

£1.59B

ACFN:

$39.95M

EPS

COA.L:

£0.10

ACFN:

$0.78

PE Ratio

COA.L:

7.85

ACFN:

20.51

PEG Ratio

COA.L:

8.81

ACFN:

0.02

PS Ratio

COA.L:

0.49

ACFN:

3.81

PB Ratio

COA.L:

2.20

ACFN:

4.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

COA.L:

£2.97B

ACFN:

$10.61M

Gross Profit (TTM)

COA.L:

£1.07B

ACFN:

$8.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

COA.L:

£543.24M

ACFN:

$1.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COA.L vs. ACFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COA.L
COA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
COA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
COA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
COA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
COA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ACFN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COA.L vs. ACFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coats Group plc (COA.L) and Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COA.LACFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

COA.L vs. ACFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COA.LACFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.13

+0.53

Drawdowns

COA.L vs. ACFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COA.L drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, roughly equal to the maximum ACFN drawdown of -56.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COA.L and ACFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COA.LACFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.37%

-56.79%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-47.20%

+28.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-31.45%

+16.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

Volatility

COA.L vs. ACFN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COA.LACFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.30%

92.54%

-63.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.07%

92.54%

-60.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.22%

92.54%

-58.32%

Dividends

COA.L vs. ACFN - Dividend Comparison

COA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, while ACFN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COA.L
Coats Group plc
3.08%2.82%2.45%2.64%2.75%1.99%0.00%1.77%1.39%1.10%

Financials

COA.L vs. ACFN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coats Group plc and Acorn Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M202120222023202420252026
763.15M
2.23M
(COA.L) Total Revenue
(ACFN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. COA.L values in GBp, ACFN values in USD

COA.L vs. ACFN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Coats Group plc and Acorn Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
36.9%
80.2%
Portfolio components
COA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coats Group plc reported a gross profit of 281.44M and revenue of 763.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

ACFN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acorn Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.79M and revenue of 2.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.2%.

COA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coats Group plc reported an operating income of 113.54M and revenue of 763.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

ACFN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acorn Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -129.00K and revenue of 2.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.8%.

COA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coats Group plc reported a net income of 44.31M and revenue of 763.15M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

ACFN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acorn Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -77.00K and revenue of 2.23M, resulting in a net margin of -3.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COA.L and ACFN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COA.L and ACFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer