ACFN vs. UTES
ACFN (Acorn Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) is Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus. Over the past year, ACFN returned -34.32% vs -3.98% for UTES. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACFN vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACFN achieves a 24.83% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's -1.07% return.
ACFN
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 24.83%
- 1Y
- -34.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.86%
UTES
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- -3.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $111.56K | $195.96K | $172.85K | |
| $11.16M | $10.04M | $13.72M |
ACFN vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACFN Acorn Energy, Inc. | 24.83% | -18.38% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | -1.07% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACFN and UTES is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACFN vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
ACFN
UTES
ACFN vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACFN | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.31 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -0.65 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACFN vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACFN drawdown since its inception was -58.11%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFN and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACFN | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.11% | -35.39% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.11% | -13.88% | -44.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.36% | -10.30% | -28.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -5.54% | -27.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.35% | 6.72% | +30.63% |
Volatility
ACFN vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) has a higher volatility of 15.16% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 5.50%. This indicates that ACFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACFN | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.16% | 5.50% | +9.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.98% | 16.19% | +32.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.14% | 21.39% | +62.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.50% | 20.74% | +66.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.50% | 20.26% | +67.24% |
Dividends
ACFN vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
ACFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFN Acorn Energy, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACFN and UTES have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACFN has higher volatility (15.16%) compared to UTES (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFN dropped -58.11% vs UTES's -35.39%.
UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACFN and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer