ACFN vs. UTES

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ACFN (Acorn Energy, Inc.) is a stock, while UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) is Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACFN vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACFN achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 5.53% return.

ACFN

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UTES

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.65%
• 3Y*: 24.73%
• 5Y*: 17.31%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACFN vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACFN Acorn Energy, Inc.	8.15%	-18.38%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	5.53%	0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ACFN and UTES is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

ACFN vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 19
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 18
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACFN vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACFN	UTES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.12	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.15	—

Drawdowns

ACFN vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACFN drawdown since its inception was -58.11%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFN and UTES.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACFN	UTES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.11%	-35.39%	-22.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.88%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.60%	-4.32%	-42.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.33%	-5.53%	-26.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACFN	UTES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.08%	21.52%	+69.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.08%	20.64%	+70.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.08%	20.21%	+70.87%

Dividends

ACFN vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

ACFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACFN Acorn Energy, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.44%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACFN and UTES in my portfolio?

ACFN and UTES have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.