PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACFN vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ACFN vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ACFN vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
12.58%-16.16%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.60%0.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACFN achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 1.60% return.


ACFN

1D
1.13%
1M
-19.32%
YTD
12.58%
6M
-40.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UTES

1D
0.11%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
1.60%
6M
-3.38%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
16.38%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Acorn Energy, Inc.

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF

Return for Risk

ACFN vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACFN

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACFN vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acorn Energy, Inc. (ACFN) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACFN vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACFNUTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.72

-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between ACFN and UTES is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ACFN vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

ACFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFN
Acorn Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.47%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Drawdowns

ACFN vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACFN drawdown since its inception was -58.11%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFN and UTES.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ACFNUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.11%

-35.39%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.41%

-7.89%

-36.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-5.51%

-23.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

Volatility

ACFN vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ACFNUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.20%

22.79%

+77.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.20%

20.28%

+79.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.20%

20.03%

+80.17%