PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYA vs. TCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNYA vs. TCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than TCHI's -0.60% return.


CNYA

1D
-0.48%
1M
-4.50%
6M
1.02%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*
5.24%
ALL TIME*
5.58%

TCHI

1D
-0.27%
1M
-6.76%
6M
-4.08%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.46M$2.43M$4.11M
$315.05K$355.12K$400.93K

CNYA vs. TCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.42%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-20.28%
TCHI
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
-0.60%33.13%9.09%-5.61%-24.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and TCHI is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022

0.79

The correlation between CNYA and TCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNYA vs. TCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNYA
TCHI

Technology

37.3%
52.9%

Financial Services

16.8%
0.6%

Industrials

14.2%
10.3%

Basic Materials

10.7%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
16.2%

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Energy

2.6%
0.7%

Communication Services

1.1%
15.8%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Technology

CNYA
37.3%
TCHI
52.9%

Financial Services

CNYA
16.8%
TCHI
0.6%

Industrials

CNYA
14.2%
TCHI
10.3%

Basic Materials

CNYA
10.7%
TCHI
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

CNYA
5.8%
TCHI
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CNYA
4.3%
TCHI
16.2%

Healthcare

CNYA
3.8%
TCHI

-

Utilities

CNYA
2.9%
TCHI

-

Energy

CNYA
2.6%
TCHI
0.7%

Communication Services

CNYA
1.1%
TCHI
15.8%

Real Estate

CNYA
0.5%
TCHI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNYA vs. TCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TCHI
TCHI Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNYA vs. TCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNYATCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

0.75

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

1.56

+4.15

CNYA vs. TCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the TCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYA and TCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. TCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, which is greater than TCHI's maximum drawdown of -43.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and TCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYATCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-43.96%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-20.73%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-27.78%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.65%

-13.03%

-6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-20.96%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

9.97%

-6.39%

Volatility

CNYA vs. TCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is 8.01%, while iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that CNYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNYATCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

10.16%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

21.38%

-5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

28.60%

-8.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

34.91%

-11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

34.91%

-11.28%

CNYA vs. TCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNYA vs. TCHI - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than TCHI's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.85%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%
TCHI
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
2.33%2.44%2.49%4.28%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNYA and TCHI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCHI has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to CNYA (8.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNYA dropped -49.49% vs TCHI's -43.96%.

On 3-year performance, TCHI leads with 9.93% vs 7.23% for CNYA. On fees, TCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CNYA has been the lower-risk option at 8.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TCHI has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.

TCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.85% for CNYA.

CNYA is categorized as China Equities, while TCHI is Technology Equities. CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while TCHI tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries Select Capped Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNYA and 0.59% for TCHI.

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNYA and TCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer