CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE
CNUA.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, from UBS and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNUA.DE returned 3.68%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for XCHA.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNUA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.DE.
Performance
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNUA.DE having a 13.12% return and XCHA.DE slightly lower at 12.47%.
CNUA.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 40.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNUA.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 13.12% | 15.18% | 24.15% | -14.62% | -18.77% | 18.43% | 30.72% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 35.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNUA.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CNUA.DE and XCHA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNUA.DE
XCHA.DE
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNUA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.38 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 4.62 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNUA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.13 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.31 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, smaller than the maximum XCHA.DE drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNUA.DE and XCHA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNUA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.81% | -52.27% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -16.43% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.63% | -26.32% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.81% | -37.07% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -1.81% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -22.73% | +7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 8.48% | -0.37% |
Volatility
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) have volatilities of 4.93% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNUA.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.10% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 10.37% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.65% | 26.51% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 23.27% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 23.20% | +3.04% |
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNUA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNUA.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNUA.DE nor XCHA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNUA.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNUA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
Both ETFs track MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CNUA.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNUA.DE and XCHA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer