CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE
CNUA.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CNUA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNUA.DE returned 3.68%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for AW1C.DE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNUA.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AW1C.DE.
Performance
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNUA.DE achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 21.11% return.
CNUA.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 40.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNUA.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 13.12% | 15.18% | 24.15% | -14.62% | -18.77% | 15.78% |
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 6.94% | 24.89% | 24.93% | -14.50% | 30.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNUA.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CNUA.DE and AW1C.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNUA.DE
AW1C.DE
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNUA.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.48 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.33 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 4.43 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNUA.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.56 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.85 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.92 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNUA.DE and AW1C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNUA.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.81% | -22.40% | -15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -16.86% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.63% | -22.40% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.81% | -22.40% | -15.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -0.12% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -5.82% | -9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 8.90% | -0.79% |
Volatility
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) at 3.81%. This indicates that CNUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNUA.DE | AW1C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.81% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 9.14% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.65% | 25.24% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 18.35% | +6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 18.11% | +8.13% |
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNUA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNUA.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNUA.DE nor AW1C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNUA.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CNUA.DE.
CNUA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. CNUA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CNUA.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNUA.DE and AW1C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer