CNTA vs. QVCGA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CNTA (Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited) and QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) are both stocks. CNTA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while QVCGA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical).

Performance

CNTA vs. QVCGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNTA

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 60.66%
• 6M: 58.31%
• 1Y: 223.25%
• 3Y*: 82.59%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: —

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNTA vs. QVCGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNTA Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited	1.03%
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%

Fundamentals

EPS CNTA : -$1.81 QVCGA : -$302.09
PS Ratio CNTA : 358.73 QVCGA : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) CNTA : $15.00M QVCGA : $9.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) CNTA : $15.00M QVCGA : $2.89B
EBITDA (TTM) CNTA : -$227.27M QVCGA : $789.00M

Return for Risk

CNTA vs. QVCGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNTA

CNTA Risk / Return Rank: 97
CNTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CNTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CNTA Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CNTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CNTA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNTA vs. QVCGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centessa Pharmaceuticals Limited (CNTA) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNTA	QVCGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.60	—	—

Drawdowns

CNTA vs. QVCGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNTA drawdown since its inception was -88.19%, which is greater than QVCGA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNTA and QVCGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNTA	QVCGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.19%	0.00%	-88.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	0.00%	-51.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNTA	QVCGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.21%	0.00%	+66.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.70%	0.00%	+71.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.09%	0.00%	+72.09%

Dividends

CNTA vs. QVCGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNTA nor QVCGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials