PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNSWF vs. CTAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNSWF
Constellation Software Inc
-26.56%-22.46%24.90%59.77%-15.99%43.09%34.48%53.34%6.04%33.51%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
-8.31%3.78%22.24%34.82%2.97%26.51%32.74%61.73%9.04%36.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNSWF:

$37.34B

CTAS:

$69.99B

EPS

CNSWF:

$23.21

CTAS:

$4.75

PE Ratio

CNSWF:

75.88

CTAS:

36.24

PEG Ratio

CNSWF:

4.02

CTAS:

2.54

PS Ratio

CNSWF:

3.20

CTAS:

6.37

PB Ratio

CNSWF:

10.46

CTAS:

14.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNSWF:

$11.68B

CTAS:

$11.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNSWF:

$3.00B

CTAS:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNSWF:

$3.02B

CTAS:

$2.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNSWF achieves a -26.56% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's -8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CNSWF has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 16.07%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.82% annualized return.


CNSWF

1D
0.11%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
-26.56%
6M
-35.88%
1Y
-45.17%
3Y*
-1.95%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
16.07%

CTAS

1D
1.71%
1M
-14.66%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-15.12%
1Y
-16.53%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
23.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNSWF vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNSWF
CNSWF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CNSWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNSWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNSWF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CNSWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNSWF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAS
CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNSWFCTASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.16

-0.78

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.77

-0.98

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.88

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.58

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.49

-1.26

-0.23

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNSWF Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNSWF and CTAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNSWFCTASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.16

-0.78

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.70

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.90

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.52

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between CNSWF and CTAS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

CNSWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than CTAS's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNSWF
Constellation Software Inc
0.23%0.17%0.13%0.16%0.26%0.22%0.41%0.41%0.63%0.83%1.76%0.96%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
1.01%0.89%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.99%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%

Drawdowns

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNSWF drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum CTAS drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNSWF and CTAS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNSWFCTASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-65.32%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.25%

-26.72%

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.25%

-26.72%

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.25%

-48.38%

-6.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.47%

-23.92%

-28.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-15.00%

+8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.66%

12.32%

+17.34%

Volatility

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Software Inc (CNSWF) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 8.32%. This indicates that CNSWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNSWFCTASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.04%

8.32%

+6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.44%

14.45%

+15.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.21%

21.42%

+17.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.99%

22.48%

+6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

26.52%

+1.88%

Financials

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
3.23B
2.84B
(CNSWF) Total Revenue
(CTAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNSWF vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellation Software Inc and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.7%
-97.8%
Portfolio components
CNSWF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a gross profit of 862.05M and revenue of 3.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

CNSWF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported an operating income of 556.42M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

CNSWF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Software Inc reported a net income of 111.69M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.