CNRG vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CNRG (SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNRG returned 4.59%/yr vs -31.62%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. CNRG charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

CNRG vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNRG achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

CNRG

• 1D: -4.28%
• 1M: -11.93%
• 6M: -1.18%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 1Y: 51.59%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNRG vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF	7.93%	50.23%	-14.48%	-11.55%	6.65%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CNRG and BITI is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.34

The correlation between CNRG and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (1 year) to -0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CNRG vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNRG

CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 46
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNRG vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNRG	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.47	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.04	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	2.57	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.04	6.38	-0.33

CNRG vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNRG and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNRG vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNRG drawdown since its inception was -68.49%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNRG and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNRG	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.49%	-92.16%	+23.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.26%	-25.28%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.77%	-84.63%	+35.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.82%	-86.41%	+56.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.66%	-68.40%	+36.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.56%	10.16%	-1.60%

Volatility

CNRG vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a higher volatility of 12.63% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.76%. This indicates that CNRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNRG	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.63%	10.76%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.37%	34.28%	-5.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.02%	44.15%	-5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.67%	52.24%	-17.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.05%	52.24%	-16.19%

CNRG vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNRG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNRG vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

CNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF	1.27%	1.46%	1.34%	1.17%	1.23%	1.34%	0.69%	1.16%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNRG and BITI in my portfolio?

CNRG and BITI have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNRG or BITI?

CNRG has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to BITI (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNRG dropped -68.49% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, CNRG or BITI?

On 3-year performance, CNRG leads with 4.59% vs -31.62% for BITI. On fees, CNRG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNRG or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, CNRG has performed better with a 4.59% return vs -31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNRG or BITI?

CNRG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNRG or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 1.27% for CNRG.

What is the main difference between CNRG and BITI?

CNRG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. CNRG tracks S&P Kensho Clean Power Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CNRG and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.