PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQQ vs. RWIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CNQQ

1D
-4.06%
1M
-6.50%
6M
-2.08%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RWIN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.70%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CNQQ and RWIN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQQ drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, which is greater than RWIN's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQQ and RWIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQQRWINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.82%

-4.09%

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.30%

-0.92%

-10.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-1.32%

-7.12%

Volatility

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNQQRWINDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

14.83%

+12.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.43%

14.83%

+12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.43%

14.83%

+12.60%

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNQQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RWIN's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNQQ vs. RWIN - Dividend Comparison

CNQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RWIN's 1.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNQQ and RWIN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RWIN is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RWIN is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

RWIN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.37% for CNQQ.

CNQQ is categorized as China Equities, while RWIN is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNQQ and 0.42% for RWIN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNQQ and RWIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer