CNQQ vs. GDX
CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CNQQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
CNQQ vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQQ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -13.61% return.
CNQQ
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -21.34%
- YTD
- -13.61%
- 1Y
- 42.30%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $685.05K | $467.08K | $508.55K | |
| $1.26B | $1.34B | $1.78B |
CNQQ vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 1.50% | -5.22% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -13.61% | 18.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQQ and GDX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQQ vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
CNQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDX
CNQQ vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNQQ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNQQ vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQQ drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQQ and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQQ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.82% | -80.34% | +62.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -36.03% | +23.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -40.37% | +31.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.97% | — |
Volatility
CNQQ vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNQQ | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.77% | 48.49% | -20.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 37.23% | -9.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 37.34% | -9.57% |
CNQQ vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNQQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNQQ vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
CNQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than GDX's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.85% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNQQ and GDX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.39% for CNQQ.
CNQQ is categorized as China Equities, while GDX is Gold. CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNQQ and 0.51% for GDX.
Find the right allocation for CNQQ and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer