PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQE.TO achieves a 38.03% return, which is significantly higher than PLTE.TO's -27.22% return.


CNQE.TO

1D
2.32%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
38.03%
6M
46.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTE.TO

1D
3.18%
1M
-10.34%
YTD
-27.22%
6M
-27.02%
1Y
48.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CNQE.TO and PLTE.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQE.TO

PLTE.TO
PLTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNQE.TOPLTE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.39

0.96

+2.43

Drawdowns

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQE.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.39%, smaller than the maximum PLTE.TO drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQE.TO and PLTE.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQE.TOPLTE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-43.92%

+31.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-37.13%

+30.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-15.37%

+12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.77%

Volatility

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNQE.TOPLTE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.20%

58.82%

-27.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.20%

70.68%

-39.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.20%

70.68%

-39.48%

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CNQE.TO and PLTE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

CNQE.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNQE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than PLTE.TO's 42.06% yield.