CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO
CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and BKCC.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CNQE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for BKCC.TO.
Performance
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQE.TO achieves a 38.03% return, which is significantly higher than BKCC.TO's 7.95% return.
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 38.03%
- 6M
- 46.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- 49.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 38.03% | 13.80% |
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 7.95% | 16.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQE.TO and BKCC.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNQE.TO
BKCC.TO
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNQE.TO | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.39 | -0.00 | +3.39 |
Drawdowns
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQE.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.39%, smaller than the maximum BKCC.TO drawdown of -100.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQE.TO and BKCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQE.TO | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -100.33% | +87.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -100.00% | +93.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -99.92% | +97.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNQE.TO | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.20% | 9.70% | +21.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.20% | 13.42% | +17.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.20% | 16.98% | +14.22% |
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNQE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCC.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNQE.TO vs. BKCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNQE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than BKCC.TO's 9.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 6.52% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 9.92% | 10.43% | 12.30% | 10.93% | 8.23% | 5.52% | 5.92% | 5.44% | 6.24% | 5.76% | 5.79% | 7.35% |