PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQE.TO achieves a 38.03% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -17.23% return.


CNQE.TO

1D
2.32%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
38.03%
6M
46.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBIX.NEO

1D
1.54%
1M
6.76%
YTD
-17.23%
6M
-39.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CNQE.TO
Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
38.03%13.80%
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
-17.23%-24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQE.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNQE.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.39

-0.46

+3.85

Drawdowns

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQE.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.39%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQE.TO and HBIX.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQE.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-55.90%

+43.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-45.19%

+38.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-20.83%

+18.20%

Volatility

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNQE.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.20%

52.56%

-21.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.20%

52.56%

-21.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.20%

52.56%

-21.36%

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNQE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNQE.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CNQE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than HBIX.NEO's 34.71% yield.