CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PD.TO).
Performance
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 38.80% | 15.58% | -1.31% | 23.72% | 42.82% | 83.55% | -19.06% | 39.72% | -29.92% | 15.97% |
ENB-PD.TO Enbridge Inc. | -0.02% | 27.68% | 14.94% | 5.47% | -13.63% | 56.16% | -4.33% | 7.06% | -17.44% | 29.51% |
Different Trading Currencies
CNQ is traded in USD, while ENB-PD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ENB-PD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 38.80% return, which is significantly higher than ENB-PD.TO's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has outperformed ENB-PD.TO with an annualized return of 19.72%, while ENB-PD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.
CNQ
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 38.80%
- 6M
- 49.86%
- 1Y
- 56.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.72%
- 5Y*
- 31.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.72%
ENB-PD.TO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNQ
ENB-PD.TO
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNQ | ENB-PD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.90 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.38 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.23 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 9.29 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNQ | ENB-PD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.90 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.71 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.16 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNQ and ENB-PD.TO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than ENB-PD.TO's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.74% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
ENB-PD.TO Enbridge Inc. | 6.21% | 6.19% | 7.05% | 7.79% | 6.42% | 5.60% | 8.15% | 7.03% | 6.50% | 5.07% | 5.83% | 6.19% |
Drawdowns
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than ENB-PD.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and ENB-PD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNQ | ENB-PD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -49.63% | -31.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.04% | -11.57% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -21.95% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.84% | -49.63% | -28.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -1.27% | -5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.64% | -10.48% | -13.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 2.65% | +3.64% |
Volatility
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PD.TO) at 2.30%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB-PD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNQ | ENB-PD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.19% | 2.30% | +6.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 6.64% | +13.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.56% | 12.23% | +19.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.70% | 15.19% | +17.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 20.03% | +20.21% |
Financials
CNQ vs. ENB-PD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities