PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQ.TO vs. IONQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CNQ.TO is traded in CAD, while IONQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IONQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQ.TO achieves a 37.61% return, which is significantly higher than IONQ's 31.54% return.


CNQ.TO

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
37.61%
6M
40.79%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
27.02%
5Y*
33.86%
10Y*
23.43%

IONQ

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.63%
YTD
31.54%
6M
16.54%
1Y
57.11%
3Y*
78.53%
5Y*
44.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
37.61%10.42%8.27%26.98%63.10%91.26%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
31.54%2.52%265.67%250.59%-78.03%50.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ.TO and IONQ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNQ.TO:

CA$132.89B

IONQ:

$21.48B

EPS

CNQ.TO:

CA$4.65

IONQ:

$0.86

PE Ratio

CNQ.TO:

13.64

IONQ:

67.11

PS Ratio

CNQ.TO:

3.34

IONQ:

99.37

PB Ratio

CNQ.TO:

2.98

IONQ:

4.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNQ.TO:

CA$39.61B

IONQ:

$187.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNQ.TO:

CA$12.42B

IONQ:

$71.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

CNQ.TO:

CA$17.78B

IONQ:

$405.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ.TO
CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNQ.TOIONQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.16

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

0.78

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

1.40

+6.58

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ.TO and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.63%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -89.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ.TO and IONQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQ.TOIONQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.63%

-89.21%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-67.84%

+52.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

-67.84%

+34.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.12%

-89.21%

+56.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.72%

-29.66%

+20.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-50.36%

+32.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.98%

37.76%

-31.78%

Volatility

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) is 8.91%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.60%. This indicates that CNQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNQ.TOIONQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

31.60%

-22.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.23%

68.87%

-44.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.98%

93.24%

-64.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.61%

100.62%

-70.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.12%

97.74%

-59.62%

Dividends

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

CNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, while IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
2.84%5.05%6.00%8.53%12.23%7.63%11.35%7.29%8.31%5.00%4.49%6.22%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CNQ.TO vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Natural Resources Limited and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
10.81B
64.67M
(CNQ.TO) Total Revenue
(IONQ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CNQ.TO values in CAD, IONQ values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CNQ.TO and IONQ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNQ.TO and IONQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer